-
Richard Burt Professional Law Corporation
-
Richard Burt Professional Law Corporation55 S Market St #1500
San Jose, CA 95113
Phone: (408) 286-7333 Categories
- Alter Ego Liability
- Attorney-Client Matters
- Blue Sky Law
- Bulk Sale
- Business Disputes
- Buy-Sell Agreement
- Commercial Law
- Contract Drafting
- Corporate Law
- Covenant not to compete
- Directors and officers
- Entity Law
- Foreign LLC
- Indemnification
- Limited Liability Comanies (LLC's)
- Limited liability companies (LLC)
- Limited Liability Partnerships
- Limited Partnerships
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Mergers and Acquisitions
- Minority Shareholders
- Non-competes
- Piercing the Corporate Veil
- Professional Corporations
- Purchase and Sale of a Business
- Qualifying to Do Business
- S corporations
- Securities Law
- Successor liability
- Suspended Entity
- Uncategorized
I Asked ChatGPT a Legal Question–Here’s What It Said
I posed the following question to ChatGPT: What is the difference between a corporation and an LLC? Here is the response generated by ChatGPT (with my comments in red): A corporation and a limited liability company (LLC) are two different … Continue reading
Posted in Alter Ego Liability, Attorney-Client Matters, Corporate Law, Entity Law, Limited liability companies (LLC), Piercing the Corporate Veil, S corporations
Tagged AI, Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT
Comments Off on I Asked ChatGPT a Legal Question–Here’s What It Said
Buyer Can Access Pre-Acquisition Attorney-Client Communications
The Delaware Court of Chancery has held that pre-merger communications — including those relating to the negotiation of the merger itself — pass to the surviving corporation in the merger, absent a contractual provision to the contrary. Thus, the buyer … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney-Client Matters, Buy-Sell Agreement, Mergers & Acquisitions, Purchase and Sale of a Business
Comments Off on Buyer Can Access Pre-Acquisition Attorney-Client Communications
No “Selective Waiver” of Attorney-Client Privilege
To show that they are good citizens, public companies are often encouraged by the government to investigate wrong-doing by their employees and then to take corrective action. Often these internal investigations are conducted by outside legal counsel, who prepare a … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney-Client Matters, Corporate Law, Directors and officers
Tagged selective waiver
Comments Off on No “Selective Waiver” of Attorney-Client Privilege
Minority Shareholder Can Not Bring Claims Against the Corporation’s Counsel
In Reilly v. Greenwald & Hoffman, LLP (2011) 196 Cal. App. 4th 891, the court held that a minority shareholder could not bring a derivative action against the corporation’s outside counsel for misrepresentation, malpractice, or breach of contract. In March … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney-Client Matters, Business Disputes, Minority Shareholders
Tagged breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, corporate counsel, derivative action, malpractice
Comments Off on Minority Shareholder Can Not Bring Claims Against the Corporation’s Counsel
Dealing With a Financially Weak Corporation
Knowingly dealing with a thinly capitalized corporation and not asking for a guaranty will make it tough to pierce the corporate veil. This is illustrated by the case of Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC, v. Ham, 614 F.3d 698 (7th … Continue reading
Posted in Alter Ego Liability, Attorney-Client Matters, Piercing the Corporate Veil
Tagged attorney's fees, attorney's fees clause, attorneys' fee clause, guarantee, guaranty, thin capitalization, thinly capitalized, undercapitalized
Comments Off on Dealing With a Financially Weak Corporation
A Risk of Making Threats in Disputes
When there is a business dispute, a party sometimes wants to use the maximum leverage possible. Caution should be exercised to make sure that the effort to exercise leverage does not boomerang. One of the common ways that parties seek … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney-Client Matters, Business Disputes, Contract Drafting
Comments Off on A Risk of Making Threats in Disputes
Whom Does an Attorney Represent When a Number of Parties Are Involved?
The case of Chang v. Lederman (2009) 172 Cal. App. 4th 67, while dealing with the obligations of an estate planning lawyer to beneficiaries of the estate, may be of interest to participants in business transactions or business enterprises. Facts … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney-Client Matters, Directors and officers, Entity Law
Comments Off on Whom Does an Attorney Represent When a Number of Parties Are Involved?
Inspection Rights of Directors and Shareholders
Corporations Code section 1602 provides that: “Every director shall have the absolute right at any reasonable time to inspect and copy all books, records and documents of every kind … of the corporation of which such person is a director….” … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney-Client Matters, Directors and officers, Entity Law
Comments Off on Inspection Rights of Directors and Shareholders